![]() |
Bill Clinton Blames Others For 911 Posted by: rj0995
Video duration: 601 seconds Bill Clinton Blames Others For 911 Related: 911, bin, blame, clinton, laden Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
You like it? Share it!
Make your own niche video sites quickly and easily!
OTHER LINKS
EVERYTHING FOR YOUR LIFE
Latest comments made on this video:
By: GentilesAgainstCrime. on 08 Jan 09, 21:50:35
Bill Clinton and his crew was behind the demolition of the embassy. Yet again, Laden hade nothing to do with it.
By: turkbros. on 08 Jan 09, 08:12:23
Why bush still couldnt find bin ladin, they were able to find damn saddam under ground. Since 911 was more severe in bush's administrative, why he couldnt find bin ladin in 8 years ? Why Bush ignored security threats that was given by CIA, why bush spent his time on his vacation, Why bush went into two countries where he thought ladin was there yet why he still couldnt find him in 8 years while they can find anyone they want to in a second. Ridiculous
By: tannalv. on 08 Jan 09, 02:40:13
Bill Clinton is upset for being faced with his irresponsible politics. If it wasn't for Bill Clinton there'd never have been any 9-11.
By: tannalv. on 08 Jan 09, 02:30:45
Why would he? He is not in England.
By: mexaguil. on 07 Jan 09, 08:19:12
You need to learn how to speak English dude.
By: hanswahheb. on 06 Jan 09, 19:56:18
Clinton have been suck his position because he is neutral US president. That is why most of the world have a good relationship with US on that time. Then, 'someone inside' realized is guy didn't bring benefit to 'someone inside'. That why he have been suck. Luckily, no one shoot him like JFK. He is a good example for US president. Clinton and JFK is the best US president.
By: mashe13. on 06 Jan 09, 01:55:25
Wow, that is the most retarded thing I've heard. 9/11 and Iraq should have had nothing to do with each other, don't blame Clinton, for Bush's fuck up. We can argue whether or not 9/11 is Clinton's fault, for arguments sake even if it was his fault, Iraq is still on Bush's head. Retard.
By: GaryVonGary. on 05 Jan 09, 05:32:43
All I know is that somewhere between what ex-CIA analyst Michael Scheuer said about Clinton having 10 attempts (2 to capture him and 8 to kill him) and what Bill Clinton said in this interview...something is wrong in Washington and the civilians are the ones who are paying the price.
By: mphman64. on 02 Jan 09, 00:58:30
AliKhaderKhan (2 weeks ago) - Oh yeah, Clinton did sooo much to destroy this country by having sex. Our economy and standing in the world is much, much better now that the extreme right has had their way for 8 years. The facts speak for themselves... Unfortunately the extreme right doesn't like facts. They prefer hate, spin, lies and FAUX News.... Get a life.
By: jehnubis. on 01 Jan 09, 14:15:33
President Bush didnt assume Iraq had Weapons of Mass destruction, the C.I.A told Bush Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. The C.I.A tells Bush Iran has a nuclear weapon, and thank God Bush didnt act on that! I feel sorry for how they will manipulate Obama!
By: jehnubis. on 01 Jan 09, 14:07:11
You are all sheep! This just goes to show who really is running the show here. It's the C.I.A. They are the strings that pull on the puppets. All presidents are just puppets manipulated by the C.I.A. If Clinton took out Bin Laden when he was in office, there would be no 9/11. Meaning, no War in Iraq.
By: OhyesSofresh. on 31 Dec 08, 04:34:25
Bill has narcissistic personality disorder. I know this because I'm a PHD student in behavioral studies, and im a Narcissist as well. We are incapable of feelings for other humans. As you can see its all about Bill. We exhibit extreme sexual tendencies. Im convinced Bill is a sex addict. I wouldnt be so quick to praise mr clinton its not like he cares about you. Its his legacy thats paramount. I believe bill is a malignment narcissist. We mimic normal human behavior. Ever watch American Pycho
By: im4wur. on 30 Dec 08, 02:41:57
Sun Tzu
By: im4wur. on 30 Dec 08, 02:40:47
I would have thought that wartime experience would have taught you not to be so quick to jump to conclusions. No? Don't take my word on the effects of Bush's war in Iraq, but you might want to hear what Richard Clark (the same R.Clark speaks of in this video) has to say about the current war in Iraq: "Charlie Rose - Bush's Iraq Strategy / Richard Clarke /..." ( watch?v=02pLdkBTERo ).
By: im4wur. on 30 Dec 08, 02:26:28
The war in Iraq has been contrary to any successful strategy in a so-called "War against terrorism". As such, our militarys actions in Iraq are most likely the mere noises before defeat. Just like Vietnam, son. However, considering your age. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and surmise that we are defining "unleash hell" in different ways.
By: im4wur. on 30 Dec 08, 02:23:35
If you've been fighting in Iraq. Then you're the one who has been used as a tool to only make the problem of global terrorism worse! I will quote whoever I choose. In this case the military genius Sun Tz, when he observed: "Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat".
By: TimmyHaag. on 30 Dec 08, 01:45:56
Grow the fuck up. Go to war and tell me how effective fighting terrorism with terrorism is. Terrorism is relative by the way. Again you sound like a tool with no purpose when you spout about unleashing hell. Also, don't spam my video with someone else's words. If we are attacked we should do nothing even close to "unleashing hell".
By: im4wur. on 30 Dec 08, 01:26:27
By the same token, I would expect the American public to "unleash hell" on those responsible for lieing us into an illegal war against a country that was NO THREAT to us; by seeing that the decision makers within the Bush administration are tried for war crimes.
By: im4wur. on 30 Dec 08, 01:25:44
My point is that it's important to know who the enemy is and apply "hell" properly. Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11/01. As such, Bush's war was not only misdirected, but was probably the WORST possible thing we could have done (in termes of creating more terrorists than we're killing. All that said, I stand by my original statement and believe IF ATTACKED. The proper response is to "unleash hell" on those that are guilty of the attack.
By: TimmyHaag. on 30 Dec 08, 01:10:24
Great idea genius. Fighting terrorism with terrorism is a sure fire way to insure that terrorists won't be motivated to terrorize again. I hope your in the military so YOU can go far away and "unleash hell" on the poor ignorant assholes of the world. If your not enlist or shut the fuck up because this assumption that we can just "unleash hell" and expext only victory and glory has gotten 4,000+ killed and over 30,000 wounded on our end alone. Grow the fuck up.
By: Uranus1962. on 29 Dec 08, 07:31:55
for sofar a woman can be castrated, but she is sterilisated already; therefore Bill Clinton needed Monica Lewinsky as in even way Barack Obama needs to have a trainee (Obamagirl) to have an affair with her!! Than History will repeat itself!
By: 10inchsoft. on 28 Dec 08, 10:46:24
Castrate Hillary!
By: DullahanVII. on 24 Dec 08, 22:14:23
Bill owned that bitch. LOL!
By: lightsaber1000. on 22 Dec 08, 01:00:51
wat a doosh, he is such an idiot, it is so obvious that 9/11 was an inside job, becoz how can bin laden attack, if you remember the Americans say he is in a cave, with electricity watching television wired to some machine witch supports his health, so now stupid fickle Americans expect to believe the rubbish given to them to by thier poor demorcrtic governement (as Bush managed to become president), and on their own FBI website stated Bin Laden
By: cedarpose. on 21 Dec 08, 07:53:12
man I wish this man had been president after 9/11. I is so much smarter than the current dumbass we have.