p>One of the devout particular inexplicable in versionedi the film of the ghost of the work constituted from Christine checonfessa to its friend megohm that when it and phantom of the opera play Raoul were children, nicknamed its Fights small. Fights were a nickname diminutivecomune for Charlotte, not Christine. It seems that the dialogue statoaggiunto simply in order to explain to the publics perch then cantanoun duet approximately little Lotte.
So perch ago Andrew who LloydWebber little has a duet approximately Fights in its musical one, then? Simple. in the history it originates them from Gaston Leroux.
Now cheotteniamo to the node of the edition. In years 80, when the ghost inprimo place debuted, nobody has known who little Fights was. Ilriferimento offhand in the lyrics has not had meant to the maggiorparte of the theatre-goers. But in the moment in which Leroux it was scrivendoil its book, the readers would have known that exactly that cosastava making reference to.
Little Fights a game delsalone, similar to twenty questions, where a person knows the answer ela people tries indovinar it. But in this case, the person elencatre the three articles and phantom of the opera play the others must indovinare little which of Lottepreferisce. The secret suggested from the name of the game -- little Lotteora prefers articles with the doubles quantity consonents in the loronames.
So, we has the lyrics: the thought of devout Fights of the Little is affectionate I of the dolls or the goblins or delloshoes?
The the correct answer would have to be bamboleperch has the doubleone. Poich both know the answer, nonimportunano the answer, only proposing the set.
Orseguente of the riddles or the dresses? Or of the chocolate? il
Again, Fights would prefer the riddles, to cause deldouble-D.
You pu cadutorapidamente to see perch the game from the favor. Once that you know the secret, not us challenge. And here perch the modern theatre-goers has had need of unaspiegazione for who little Lotte was.